To: hoosiermama
Peabody directed me here.
HRCs Field Sobriety Test
HRCs Field Sobriety Test Retweeted Matt Couch 🎙 ICYMI: Crowdstrike Hush Money payments...
During the 2016 Presidential Election, the biggest story became how Russia hacked the election. The 17 intelligence agencies that Hillary Rodham Clinton cited all relied on word from a contracted company, Crowdstrike.
All payments cited below are part of the Federal Election Committee data of campaign spending on the www.fec.gov website.
Crowdstrike is a technology company that specializes in cyber-security. Not only is there conflict of interest with Crowdstrike receiving payments, campaign data shows some incredible correlations with the payments that were made.
The first payments made were preemptive measures on May 5th, 2016 when the DNC was looking to figure out where the breach of security was. Payments made on May 5th, 2016 of $7,650.00 and $1,462.50 were likely paid for Crowdstrike to install their Falcon software, a stellar technology security suite that would identify any internal or external security breach.
The final email on Wikileaks from the DNC is dated May 25th, 2016. Crowdstrike would have had complete knowledge of the party that ripped the emails from the server.
The next payment that was made to Crowdstrike occurred on July 11th, 2016 for the amount of $98,849.84. The relationship to this date happens to be the day after DNC Data Director of New Voter Registration Seth Rich was murdered.
The final payment to date is August 3rd, 2016. This coincides with another murder in the District of Columbia. Shawn Lucas, who died on August 2nd of last year, was the DNC Process Server and close friend of Seth Rich. The payment on August 3rd included two checks, one for $113,645.77 and the other for $4,275.00.
We find it highly coincidental that both of these payments came within 24 hours of two high profile murders in Washington D.C., which both have connection to the DNC.
ICYMI: Crowdstrike had a no bid contract with FBI the same month Mid-Year Exam Started...
ICYMI: Not only did FBI *not* get to view the DNC server... As of a couple months ago,DOJ never even saw a final report!
The more you know...
And who was responsible for those two figure payments? Donna B?
Follow the money!!
3,318 posted on
09/25/2019 1:08:42 PM PDT by
STARLIT
(Hope is standing in the dark looking out at the light in Jesus Christ.)
To: NIKK
3,334 posted on
09/25/2019 1:52:53 PM PDT by
hoosiermama
(When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
To: NIKK
well, we do know that the “17” IC agencies cited by HRC is BS.
Only 3 plus the DNI...the rest are depts withing another branch.
The Marines have an Intelligence dept. Coast Guard has theirs...etc...none of them had any input on the Jan 2017 ICA report. So if they did “approve” it (no indication that they did) it would have been a rubber stamp job.
Now the name Evanina rang a bell. Another Pres. OBama holdover ...Grassley had doubts among others.
Starting to scratch my head why Pres. Obama holdovers are ok ?
3,360 posted on
09/25/2019 2:51:52 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
To: NIKK
*** And who was responsible for those two figure payments? Donna B? Follow the money!! ***
Hillary had already co-opted the DNC which was broke...happened under DWS... everything goes back to Hillary
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774
"On the phone Gary told me the DNC had needed a $2 million loan, which the campaign had arranged. No! That can’t be true!” I said. “The party cannot take out a loan without the unanimous agreement of all of the officers.”
“Gary, how did they do this without me knowing?” I asked. “I don’t know how Debbie relates to the officers,” Gary said. He described the party as fully under the control of Hillary’s campaign, which seemed to confirm the suspicions of the Bernie camp. The campaign had the DNC on life support, giving it money every month to meet its basic expenses, while the campaign was using the party as a fund-raising clearinghouse. Under FEC law, an individual can contribute a maximum of $2,700 directly to a presidential campaign. But the limits are much higher for contributions to state parties and a party’s national committee.
“Wait,” I said. “That victory fund was supposed to be for whoever was the nominee, and the state party races. You’re telling me that Hillary has been controlling it since before she got the nomination?”
according to Brazile
3,371 posted on
09/25/2019 3:37:48 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson