“The first author of the study, Morten Frisch from the Danish State Serum Institute, is an intactivist, who has been heading a campaign against non-medical circumcision in Denmark. In the study, the vast majority of the circumcised participants listed their religious affiliation as Lutheran, and thus, in Denmark, it is fair to assume these men were circumcised for medical reasons. The causes for medical circumcision are well-known risk factors for sexual dysfunction. It is no surprise, therefore, that male circumcision in this study was associated with increased risk of sexual problems. But this is the result of disease that existed prior to circumcision. Therefore, the study is of little or no relevance regarding circumcision of healthy males.
Rather than basing statements on a single study, systematic reviews of existing scientific studies are the gold standard for assessment of causality. Five recent reviews have shown no association between non-medical male circumcision and experienced sexual function (eg Shabanzadeh et al, 2016; Friedberg et al, 2016; Yang et al, 2017).”
- https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jul/24/the-myth-of-male-circumcision-and-sexual-dysfunction
There are a lot of other studies, and also neurosensitity measurements...
It turns out...
For men... There is a massive ammount of nerves...
Again? Did you think added that just as a joke?
It is a silly tradition and for you older people.. Talk to your children or grand children about it and tell them to research it.
Anyhow, I was not planning this discussion - it is not something I am campaigning for...I wanted to discuss 911.
But, discussing 911 is not allowed even here.
So, “peniswars 2019” is is...
Pay attention to what topics are not allowed to be discussed btw. It might be a clue..