[Tell It Right]

"A reasonable person is going to look at the situation and think 'Guns? Plain clothes? I’m outta here, and if one of those bastards gets in the way TOO DAMN BAD!'"

The man had just committed armed robbery and was trying to get away with his kids in the car. He was not "a reasonable person".

Armed robbery: That means he pointed his gun at people and threatened to kill him if they didn't hand him money. He knew exactly who was coming after him -- the police. It doesn't matter if they were wearing police uniforms or any other costume worn by the Village People. He knew they were the police. It's why he tried to run them over. It's that simple. If the police had causally let him go they would have been responsible for the next people the "reasonable person" threatened to kill over money.

https://news.yahoo.com/man-jailed-hospital-release-following-police-shooting-193441895.html

[null and void]

The crime was on April 11, the shooting was on April 28.

April 28^th? The man had "just" committed armed robbery over two weeks ago.

[deport]

The man had just committed armed robbery and was trying to get away with his kids in the car.

*************

The armed robbery was back on April 11 and
the four children were his sisters.

[walkingdead]

The man had not just committed the robbery. He allegedly committed the robbery April 11.

Heck the first sentence of the article you site said they picked him up on the robbery warrant. Did you suppose he robbed the place, was running from the robbery, and the warrant just miraculously appeared?

In the words of the Monday Night Football segment...... come on man!