Skip to comments.
New artifacts suggest first people arrived in North America earlier than previously thought
Oregon state University ^
| August 29, 2019
| Michelle Klampe
Posted on 09/09/2019 5:35:16 PM PDT by Openurmind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 last
To: Yosemitest
“Dr Heather Graven - Fossil fuel emissions will complicate radiocarbon dating, warns scientist”
ROTFLMAO!
He says in the future it ma be affected!So you have put up the argument that carbon dating IS a good method! THANK YOU!
The new study indicates that by 2020, the fraction of carbon-14 could drop to such an extent that radiocarbon dating will start to be affected.
To: Yosemitest
“Dr. Alan Zindler - ERRORS ARE FEARED IN CARBON DATING
“
Debunked? I dont think so!
”The largest deviation, 3,500 years, was obtained for samples that are about 20,000 years old.”
To: Yosemitest
E Marian Scott • Gordon T Cook • Philip Naysmith - ERROR AND UNCERTAINTY IN RADIOCARBON MEASUREMENTS
4497 +/- 12 years!
ALL YOUR LINKS SUPPORT CARBON DATING!
To: Yosemitest
“Dr Steven Austin - Radio-dating in Rubble”
ROTFLMAO!
https://www.noanswersingenesis.org.au/mt_st_helens_dacite_kh.htm
This laboratory no longer performs K-Ar dating. However, when they did, their website clearly stated in a footnote that their equipment could not accurately date rocks that are younger than about 2 million years old “
To: TexasGator
"Debunked ?
I don't think so!"
CORRECTION: You don't think, period.
65
posted on
09/11/2019 10:46:42 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: TexasGator
Read it for yourself:
"... recently science teams at the British Antarctic Survey and Reading University unearthed the discovery that samples of moss could be brought back to life after being frozen in ice.
The kicker ?
That carbon dating deemed the moss to have been frozen for over 1,500 years.
Now, if this carbon dating agrees with other evolutionary methods of determining age, the team could have a real discovery on their hands.
Taken alone, however, the carbon dating is unreliable at best, and at worst, downright inaccurate. ..."
66
posted on
09/11/2019 10:57:00 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
ROTFLMAO!
An opinion written by an anonymous person!
To: TexasGator
You should talk to a professional about your delusions, and your misplaced trust in so-called 'science'.
68
posted on
09/11/2019 2:12:59 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
“ou should talk to a professional about your delusions, and your misplaced trust in so-called ‘science’.”
Typical Marxist tactic. When you dont have the facts on your side GP personal by attacking the messenger.
To: TexasGator
Sounds like PROJECTION to me !
70
posted on
09/12/2019 5:09:09 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson