Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FLT-bird
If concern for the expansion of slavery had been the motivation, Southern states would hardly have seceded with only their own sovereign territory. By doing so, they gave up any chance to expand slavery to new territory.

Into new territory they acquired. They had their eyes on Cuba and parts of Mexico and Central America.

Ignoring the facts is claiming expansion of slavery was the motivation when they were content to leave with no claim upon the western territories and claiming they were leaving to protect something that wasn’t threatened anyway. Your arguments just don’t stand up.

They stand up for anyone who has done any reading on the subject.

151 posted on 09/10/2019 10:37:49 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

You say they “had their eyes on” foreign territory. So what? Are you seriously trying to argue they seceded for the opportunity to spread slavery to Cuba where it already existed? Mexico where the climate for tobacco and cotton production was unsuitable? Don’t make me laugh.

The facts do indeed stand up for anybody who has read up on the subject. Slavery was not threatened in the US. Nobody fought for or against it. Both sides in this war like most wars fought over money.


160 posted on 09/10/2019 11:37:14 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson