I grokked that the article was about Horowitz’ first report which is out and discussed and taken apart bit by bit.
The first report was very, very narrow.
The second OIG report is much more important and larger scope and the author of the article has no idea what is or is not covered in it. So my criticism is valid.
Bump so my lurker self can find my way back.
I see and have no problem with that. Rock on.