Such as this classic Slo-Joe false claim:
Curious that someone like you who thinks he knows what is going on, wasn't aware that the organization concerned about "free soil" in Kansas, was a thousand miles away in New York.
ROFLOL
I suppose I would simply be astounded by your take on the World Wars.
So lets try again? Since you departed from the conversation to go off on a rant about waterways.
I suppose the next reply will have us counting oceans?
---- So why do you object to the Free Soil party having two Senators from Ohio and New Hampshire?
New Hampshire John P. Hale (FS)
Ohio Salmon P. Chase (FS)
and why do you object the Free Soil party having nine elected Representatives from being from Connecticut, indiana, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin?
Connecticut Walter Booth (FS)
Indiana George W. Julian (FS)
Massachusetts Charles Allen (FS)
New Hampshire Amos Tuck (FS)
New York Preston King (FS)
Ohio Joshua R. Giddings (FS)
Ohio Joseph M. Root (FS)
Pennsylvania John W. Howe (FS)
Wisconsin Charles Durkee (FS)
If you do not have the mental capacity to understand complex concepts, then you should just say so, and i'll quite trying to pour a gallon of knowledge into your little thimble head.
What you failed to grasp about my "waterway" point is that all these people have economics in common with New York. Their interests are New York's interests.
And that condition persists today.
Why were there free soilers in other Northern states that shared waterways with New York city? Because they are all part of the same economic coalition.