Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Court Rules Parents Don’t Have a Right to Know When Their Daughters are Considering an...
LIFE NEWS ^ | AUG, 28, 2019 | Micaiah Bilger

Posted on 08/28/2019 10:14:18 PM PDT by Morgana

FULL TITLE: Federal Court Rules Parents Don’t Have a Right to Know When Their Daughters are Considering an Abortion

A federal appeals court upheld a block Tuesday on an Indiana law that requires underage girls to inform their parents before having an abortion.

A Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals panel allowed the block to remain in place, rejecting an appeal from the state that asked to be allowed to enforce the law, the AP reports.

The law, which passed in 2017, strengthens current Indiana laws regarding parental rights by requiring abortion providers to obtain proof of consent from a parent or legal guardian before a girl under 18 has an abortion. It gives parents/legal guardians a civil recourse if someone fraudulently poses as a parent in order for a minor girl to get an abortion. It also makes sure parents are involved if a minor appears before a judge to request an abortion without her parents’ consent.

The Planned Parenthood abortion chain and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit challenging the parental consent law the same year. Their lawyers argued that abortion clinics should be allowed to perform abortions on young girls without their parents’ knowledge. A lower court later issued a preliminary injunction blocking the law.

The Seventh Circuit judges agreed with the injunction this week.

“The State has not yet come forward with evidence showing that there is a problem for the new parental notice requirement to solve, let alone that the law would reasonably be expected to solve it,” Judge David Hamilton wrote in his decision, WBAA News reports.

The ACLU of Indiana claims the provisions violate young women’s constitutional rights by imposing “new burdens” on their access to abortion.

However, Indiana Right to Life President Mike Fichter previously said parents should have a role in decisions that affect their underage daughter’s health.

“Planned Parenthood claims abortion is a ‘women’s right,’ but this rhetoric forgets we’re talking about young, minor girls,” he told LifeNews. “An abortion is not a trivial health decision to be made lightly. Parents deserve to be involved and informed.”

Parental notification/parental consent laws have strong public support. Currently, 37 states require some type of parental involvement in a minor’s abortion, according to the Guttmacher Institute.

These laws can help protect young women from abusive situations. Sexual abusers have been known to take their young victims to abortion clinics when they become pregnant.

In 2008, a Planned Parenthood in Bloomington, Indiana was exposed for agreeing to help cover up the alleged sexual abuse of a minor in an undercover sting.

In another case in Ohio, Planned Parenthood faced a lawsuit after it failed to report the statutory rape of a 14-year-old girl. The girl’s soccer coach got her pregnant and then took her to the abortion clinic to cover up his crime, LifeNews reported.

Serrin Foster, president of Feminists for Life, previously has spoken about how parental involvement laws help protect vulnerable young girls from abuses.

“Who takes under-aged, pregnant girls across state lines for abortion? Most often, it’s noncustodial, older men who are sexual predators seeking to conceal the crime of statutory rape or other noncustodial adults involved in sex trafficking of minors,” she wrote at LifeNews in 2012.

Foster pointed to the testimony of abortionist Bruce Lucero who wrote in the New York Times: “… a parent’s input is the best guarantee that a teenager will make a decision that is correct for her—be it abortion, adoption or keeping the baby. And it helps guarantee that if a teenager chooses an abortion, she will receive appropriate medical care.”

However, Planned Parenthood, NARAL and other abortion advocacy groups often lobby against parental involvement laws. They believe that underage girls should be able to abort their unborn babies in a dangerous surgical or drug-induced abortion procedure without their parents’ knowledge or consent.

In 2013, Planned Parenthood also filed a lawsuit in Montana to overturn its parental involvement requirements.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: abortion; clownbammyjudge; indiana; judciairy; judiciary; parentalrights; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: jmacusa
"judge" David Hamilton is a Clownbammy "judge ".
21 posted on 08/29/2019 5:02:55 AM PDT by kiryandil (The Media & the DNC tells you who you're gonna vote for. We CHOSE Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal

little davey hamilton is a two-fer - appointed by Rapin Bill to the Federal bench, then defecated on the Seventh Circus Court of Appeals by Clownbammy.


22 posted on 08/29/2019 5:06:39 AM PDT by kiryandil (The Media & the DNC tells you who you're gonna vote for. We CHOSE Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I wonder if the government feels its necessary to tell me if my daughter is considering a hysterectomy? Or tubal ligation?

The insurance companies and doctors sure would!

It’s all about how these folks get paid.


23 posted on 08/29/2019 5:29:53 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I have known two women who had abortions in their twenties who later found out they were unable to carry a baby to term because of scarring caused by the abortion. Does the court think 14-17 year old girls are mature enough to consider that possibility before making the decision to abort? So you can’t give the girl an Ibuprofen without contacting the parents, but abortions alright? We live in a strange, perverse world


24 posted on 08/29/2019 5:47:03 AM PDT by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Well shouldn’t the teenage girl at least have to undergo a criminal background check before she is allowed to kill someone?


25 posted on 08/29/2019 6:10:38 AM PDT by chris37 (Monday, March 25 2019 is Maga Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

But don’t let them walk to the playground alone or you’ll be charged with neglect and child endangerment.....


26 posted on 08/29/2019 6:37:09 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

You provided a very insightful answer, based on information we all have, trends we are all seeing.
I agree, I don’t think a full out, expansive, sustained and declared war between the Red & the Blue is likely to happen.
The average Americans don’t wish to disrupt their daily routines.

Anything close to wars will be done as small local incidents, based on specific issues. We are now too balkanized to unite under issues worthy of warring over. The left will come closest to all out combat, as they have Antifa, PLO, BLM, LaRaza, most media etc. already. I think conservatives will begin making greater use of lawsuits, business boycotts and votes to support our side.


27 posted on 08/29/2019 8:19:02 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

The left will come closest to all out combat, as they have Antifa, PLO, BLM, LaRaza, most media etc. already.....Absolutely

I think conservatives will begin making greater use of lawsuits, business boycotts and votes to support our side.....It’s long past due that we start using their SOPs against them. They obviously don’t like that.


28 posted on 08/29/2019 8:29:25 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Teotwawki

What a great story! God bless you!


29 posted on 08/29/2019 8:59:14 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it. --Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson