>>If JD can’t get an indictment out of McCabe’s
I remember our excitement at the thought of a Utah indictment as there was a common sense that a DC grand jury would be loath to indict a Democrat and almost certain not to convict. My initial reaction to McCabe was fear that it will lead to nothing.
<<< “ ... our excitement at the thought of a Utah indictment as there was a common sense that a DC grand jury would be loath to indict a Democrat and almost certain not to convict. “ >>>
That was HUBER, I believe. Huber was of UTAH residency and he was the single Sessions appointment, who was charged with investigating HRC, Clinton Foundation, Arkansas archives, Uranium 1, etc.
McCabe should soon fall victim to the Inspector General Horriwitz’ report, now completed on the results of the JD/FBI (insider) investigation. The jurisdiction of DC Grand Juries are implied in this case, I think.
Thankfully, the DC judges have been doing pretty fine work against the FBI in the Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort cases. At least and so far these DC judges have forced the FBI to have to reach a little, produce cause, justify it, or to otherwise give up on a charge, or an argument when they fail.