To: simpson96
A man in a dress is in fact a man in a dress.
3 posted on
08/24/2019 11:35:29 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
Brown says he informed his manager both verbally and by text that she would not be able to work 'her scheduled shift' on June 25, 2017, the day of the Chicago Pride Parade. But when she arrived for work the following day, she was told she was no longer employed by Circle K and should leave the premises immediately.
So he refused to show up for his shift.....not unusual at all for no shows to be fired....if it's not authorized you have to be there. Attending a gay parade is not an excuse.
12 posted on
08/24/2019 11:45:02 AM PDT by
caww
To: BenLurkin
Your post made me laugh. Ten, twenty years ago would you have thought you’d have to post that comment?
49 posted on
08/24/2019 1:50:05 PM PDT by
Rusty0604
(2020 four more years!)
To: BenLurkin
I clicked through to the original article.
Yes, man in a dress.
Not that there's anything wrong with that. But man in a dress just the same.
To: BenLurkin
A man in a dress is in fact a man in a dress.
Probably wearing make-up! Sometimes you have an ugly man in a dress which makes an ugly woman..
57 posted on
08/24/2019 3:57:15 PM PDT by
tallyhoe
To: BenLurkin
58 posted on
08/24/2019 4:40:19 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
To: BenLurkin
If it looks like a duck....
60 posted on
08/24/2019 5:33:06 PM PDT by
GingisK
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson