Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: No_Doll_i; mairdie

Okay, I am not getting it exactly - so this fed ruling says that electors have to go by the vote in their states and not the national popular vote total? If that’s what it means of course it’s good. I thought it meant the other way at first reading.


533 posted on 08/21/2019 3:29:58 PM PDT by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

so this fed ruling says that electors have to go by the vote in their states and not the national popular vote total?
***************
Would love for the SC to rule that the electors should cast their ballots according to how the vote went in each Congressional District. After all that’s what a Electoral College vote represents.

That would really put a twist in the Socialist/Dem’s plan to circumvent the Constitution.

Look at all that red on the map in all the Congressional Districts across the USA. Large urban votes (think vote harvesting) could not cancel out the will of the voters in the rural Congressional Districts, and the only Dem Electoral votes cast would be the ones generated in large cities.


599 posted on 08/21/2019 7:20:33 PM PDT by Yulee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson