Finally somebody gets it that non-cash government benefits are not included in the tabulations when poverty statistics are compiled. People can have all their basic needs covered by taxpayers (welfare, food stamps, housing, utilities, 3 meals a day for the kiddies, “free” public schools, and even a free phone) have a small income (plus whatever isn’t reported) and still be considered to be living in poverty. In addition to all the government programs, there are thousands of private charities dedicated to helping the poor.
There is very little true poverty in the US except for the homeless, and they have their own set of problems. True poverty is found primarily in socialist 3rd world countries.
It is my contention that the generous welfare state is the adding to births out of wedlock and fueling the drug addiction crisis both through providing support for people so they can afford drugs and alcohol, and by destroying incentive and dignity. You can’t keep people as if they were expensive pets and expect them to keep their dignity. Everybody needs a sense of purpose.
tl;dr
I’m doing just fine, thanks. I have all the toys I want and do pretty much everything I want to do, if I’m physically up to it. Which ain’t much. LOL
Some people talk about refusing Social Security money on principle.But if you’re in a position to do that, you are in a position to use the money to indemnify your descendants from that ponzi scheme by giving your SS money to them.
To the extent you can, and even if only in your will.