Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CondoleezzaProtege
I realize it's Newsweek, but this isn't the first time I've heard an NRA member or supporter make such points.

Don't be fooled. Is he REALLY a member, and if so, is probably one of those "I am a gun owner but support . . .[fill in the latest anti-gun law] people. The tip-off is: The NRA's organizational position was clear. They didn't want to prohibit convicted domestic abusers from purchasing guns. Why? Because any gun purchase—even by a dangerous person—increases profits for gun manufacturers, and any regulation—even common-sense ones—is to be opposed.
Right out of the anti-gun playbook.

Even in my youth in the 1980s and early 90s—after the NRA became deeply involved in public policy

I went through that age and when the anti-gun Jihad started in the '60s, gun owners were getting beat to death as the NRA thought fighting back was beneath them. The membership raised Hell and they got into the lobbying business in a big way.

68 posted on 08/07/2019 11:02:17 AM PDT by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Oatka; CondoleezzaProtege
By the way, I just noticed the disclaimer at the bottom:

Neese is a Marine Corps veteran and founding member of the Everytown for Gun Safety Veterans Advisory Council.

That screams Bloomberg puppetry.

69 posted on 08/07/2019 11:05:38 AM PDT by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson