That cannot be done because the 115K sealed indictments don't exist.
You are such a stubborn old fool, as evidenced by your inability to admit when your are wrong and your attacks against anyone who challenges you.
You admit that you do not have access to PACER and have never used the system, and yet that somehow qualifies you, in your feeble mind, to comment on something that you know nothing about as if your words are the Gospel truth.
FYI: I have had a PACER account since the system went live in 2001. I have used PACER literally thousands of times, and indeed, my law practice depends upon it. In addition, I have litigated dozens of cases in the federal court system over the last 35 years, and have a very close relationship with someone who is a prosecutor. My information is based upon personal experience and a personal relationship with someone who has direct knowledge and information concerning the subject matter at issue. You? Your information comes from the equivalent of the tooth fairy. While that might entitle you to an opinion, it does not make your opinion right.
A lawyer. Well that explains everything.
Your words are wind.
While that might entitle you to an opinion, it does not make your opinion right.
Just as your alleged lawyer status doesn't make your opinion right.
#ArrogantLawyerClass
Can you look on Pacer now?
Please point out any statements I made that were wrong, counsellor. Facts not in evidence.
and your attacks against anyone who challenges you.
As an alleged litigator, when you made arguments before the court, were those arguments considered 'attacks'?
Please point out any 'attacks' I've made. Facts not in evidence.
Did you win many cases?
You are such a stubborn old fool.
The court might consider this an 'attack'. Whaddya' think, counsellor.
Objection. Speculation.
Sustained.