Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: walkingdead

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act

The Mulford Act was a 1967 California bill that repealed a law allowing public carrying of loaded firearms.{SNIP}

AB-1591 was authored by Don Mulford (R) from Oakland, John T. Knox (D) from Richmond, Walter J. Karabian (D) from Monterey Park, Alan Sieroty (D) from Los Angeles, and William M. Ketchum (R) from Bakersfield,[5] it passed both Assembly (controlled by Democrats 42:38) and Senate (split 20:20) and was signed by Governor Ronald Reagan on July 28. The law banned the carrying of loaded weapons in public. [6]

Both Republicans and Democrats in California supported increased gun control. Governor Ronald Reagan, who was coincidentally present on the capitol lawn when the protesters arrived, later commented that he saw “no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons” and that guns were a “ridiculous way to solve problems that have to be solved among people of good will.” In a later press conference, Reagan added that the Mulford Act “would work no hardship on the honest citizen.”[7]

The bill was signed by Reagan and became California penal code 25850 and 171c.


3 posted on 08/05/2019 9:38:04 AM PDT by RedStateRocker (We had entirely enough government in 1789.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RedStateRocker

Thank you for posting that. Ronnie did a lot of good things. The Mulford Act was NOT one of them.


5 posted on 08/05/2019 9:50:54 AM PDT by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RedStateRocker
guns were a “ridiculous way to solve problems that have to be solved among people of good will.”

People of good will use guns to solve problems caused by people of BAD will. And that is why citizens should be carrying loaded weapons as they go about their daily business.

12 posted on 08/05/2019 10:17:11 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RedStateRocker

Thank you for injecting some reality in the thread for the Ronnie Sunshine Pumper club. No person, especially no politician, is able to end up on the positive side of the ledger with every action.


26 posted on 08/05/2019 11:51:41 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RedStateRocker; RKV; NorthMountain; T-Bird45

That was bad. I opine that the 1986 Amnesty was worse.

The adopted son of California, and its former two-term Governor - which made him a two-term President - guaranteed that the Golden State, once more generally and reliably conservative than Texas, would be lost.

I remember well how dismayed I was, first on behalf of legal immigrants, second on behalf of my beloved state.

He chose to surrender, instead of making the DemoKKKrats own it. In so doing, he gave the globalist Neocon RINOpublicans the template for surrender in perpetuity (which they have enjoyed).


27 posted on 08/05/2019 6:17:17 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson