I have a decent sized house they can do the show in.
Is it because Wexner, the owner of VS, is tied to EPSTEIN???
My guess is somebody demanded to include a tranny, and the rest bailed rather than be involved.
LOL! Their talent scout is in prison.
Lends credence to the suspicion that these shows were just cover for elite sex trafficking.
If the whole point was to give cover for Epstein’s activities in particular, and he’s not available... well then, the show is a waste of time now isn’t it.
the are attending to their “brandings”.
smell the burning flesh. THEY ARE SICK.
Sexy is now...
...controversial.
I’ll need photo evidence
##############$#$$$$$$$$$
Ha ha Well played!
Why do I have a feeling trannies are involved here?
Jeffrey Epstein and Les Wexner related, I’ll bet...
They couldn’t enlist enough trannies in time for the show.
VS will now only have Trans models:-)
Imvho, Victoria Secret’s major problem is that (unlike the long ago days when my late wife modeled lingerie/swimwear/bridal attire for VS in England in the 1970s) the company quit selling the BEAUTIFUL & ROMANTIC lace & quality silk undergarments, pretty/high-quality outerwear & better swimwear & started selling OVERPRICED & POOR QUALITY cotton stuff that young girls could easily afford.
Btw, in the early days of Victoria Secret, the company made outfits that made even rather “ordinary-looking” women “of a certain age” look glamorous.= The dressing gown worn by “Lynn Bracken”/Kim Basinger was the sort of thing that Victoria Secret sold back “in the old days”.
(In the early days, most of the models, who were called “Ladies” rather than “Angels”, were mostly in their late 20s or early-mid 30s.- My “VK” retired on her 30th birthday, btw.)
I guess what I’m saying is that had the company NOT completely changed their “marketing strategy” that the company wouldn’t now be in financial difficulty.
Yours, TMN78247
Hard to get enough advertising revenue to pay the bills for an extravaganza on that level of viewership.