Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wardaddy

You’re kidding, right?


24 posted on 07/28/2019 11:05:07 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: stanne

No I’m not

I just googled cosmo covers and while they seem obsessed with women pining for sexual fulfillment it doesn’t pass as porn to me

Hence I asked you what are your standards

Cleavage?

Bare legs?

Cosmo models are no less clothed than any other women’s glamour rag

We don’t all think alike here especially about sexual mores

Which is why I ask you, I probably disagree with your definition but I’m not going to condemn you I’m just interested

Porno to me is maybe graphic total nudity but not always

And sexual acts of course

Sexual verbiage is more obscenity than porn to be particular about it

I’m more interested what are your standards for graphic displays and what you consider porn

Cheerleaders?

Bikinis?

Merry Widows?


33 posted on 07/28/2019 11:18:45 AM PDT by wardaddy (I applaud Jim Robinson for his comments on the Southern Monuments decision ...thank you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson