It’s not just the twerking model on the cover but several lead ins promoting kinky sex as well.
Publix places a translucent sheet over Cosmo on the rack.
One could argue some of the titles are salacious
The models are not even remotely nude
heres a link to a ton of covers....you tell me
It’s a silly rag run by aging dried up feminists who haven’t had an orgasm since last century if ever and homosexual men who think women view sex like they do which is hilarious
Homosexuals want women to look like twinks or trannies
To me cosmopolitan is now a parody of itself
But it’s not pornography to me
Anyone who thinks that must have a low bar
My question is is it porn....not to me
Have any of you looked at the models
Some of the verbiage is bordering obscenity but without curse words ....I don’t care to be honest but yes 9 year olds don’t need to read titles about female orgasms I agree
Publix where I shop btw would suit me to simply not carry it for politics more than....alleged porn
Nobody yet will answer me though
At what level of lack of clothing or cover up is it porn....
I think some folks here think any presentation of women as sexual alluring objects partially clothed is porn
I don’t see women twerking on the cover and most are dressed like a nite out clubbing at most
Is this porn to some Freepers?