Posted on 07/28/2019 10:32:54 AM PDT by PROCON
Let’s see now, Bill cheats on Hillary and she stands by him for the political gains.
Just another of myriad examples that shows clearly the Left (i.e., Democrats) live in a “reality” they create in their heads. It is impossible to hold a rational conversation with emotional people who simply deny reality ... yet our GOP leaders continue try to reason with the Democrat/Left, get absolutely nowhere, then condemn conservatives (and the President) for providing evidence to the contrary ... crystal clear evidence that cannot be denied. (Then again, perhaps the GOP leaders also live in an “alternate reality” ... seems so.)
"Jeffrey Epstein - Good Fatherhood Role Model"
;>)
Youre kidding, right?
One could argue some of the titles are salacious
The models are not even remotely nude
heres a link to a ton of covers....you tell me
Its a silly rag run by aging dried up feminists who havent had an orgasm since last century if ever and homosexual men who think women view sex like they do which is hilarious
Homosexuals want women to look like twinks or trannies
To me cosmopolitan is now a parody of itself
But its not pornography to me
Anyone who thinks that must have a low bar
They didn't let their marriage get in the way of their sex lives. Cosmo approves.
Well yes, now that we live in Bizarro World, up is down and lies are truth.
A marriage role model...a lying philanderer/rapist and a murderous cuck , both grifters and con artists.
A match made in hell.
My parents divorced when I was 18 & they are 100 times the marriage role models these two creepers pretend to be.
My former pastor tells the story of the family standing in line at the grocery store. His wife and daughters exclaimed "gross" at a particularly provocative Cosmopolitan cover showing a nearly naked model. The pastor said he happened to glance at his teen-aged son and gross was not what his son was thinking.
The original article is more than three years old! LOL.
No Im not
I just googled cosmo covers and while they seem obsessed with women pining for sexual fulfillment it doesnt pass as porn to me
Hence I asked you what are your standards
Cleavage?
Bare legs?
Cosmo models are no less clothed than any other womens glamour rag
We dont all think alike here especially about sexual mores
Which is why I ask you, I probably disagree with your definition but Im not going to condemn you Im just interested
Porno to me is maybe graphic total nudity but not always
And sexual acts of course
Sexual verbiage is more obscenity than porn to be particular about it
Im more interested what are your standards for graphic displays and what you consider porn
Cheerleaders?
Bikinis?
Merry Widows?
Rhea Perlman & Danny DeVito
Cosmopolitan is pornographic trash, run by a bunch of slutty leftist hags.
For them to hold up the Clinton marriage up as an example to follow only proves the depths of their sluttiness and depravity.
Wile E. Coyote and The Road Runner
Miss Piggy & Kermit
How about Monica Lewinskis marriage oh right never mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.