To: nathanbedford
I believe I read that the judge tossed it out based on "initial reporting."
However, I thought the case was not about the initial reporting, but the sustained reporting about the children days after knowing the true facts.
I'm sure that Sandmann's lawyer is all over this, given how he was presented as the premier lawyer for these types of cases.
-PJ
35 posted on
07/27/2019 9:14:55 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
To: Political Junkie Too
The heading of the initail Washington POS article was the video of the confrontation between the frig indian and a then-anonymous Sandmann.
The 83-year-old fossil judge is too incompetent to understand that it was an open invitation by the WaPOS to doxx Sandmann.
That's OK. Be a shame if somebody doxxed Bertelman's family, seeing as how he's too incompetent to hide his particulars on the Internet.
Wonder if his grandson Nick got some strings pulled to "help" his lawyering career?
42 posted on
07/27/2019 9:28:06 AM PDT by
kiryandil
(The Media & the DNC tells you who you're gonna vote for. We CHOSE Trump.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson