Replies

ThankQ for this info!!!

https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/KUP310A.html#p5

Remember how RM suddenly butted in when 9/11 was mentioned?

Found this post on 8ch:

https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/KUP310A.html#p5
As history has shown, being a friend and/or C.I.A. asset of George H. W. Bush can be an uncertain proposition. One by one, once these psychopathic proxies had served their purpose, they were “taken out”. In the case of Noriega and Gotti, they were silenced through the capable tools of the American justice system. And overseeing the prosecutions – Noriega, Gotti, and BCCI - happened to be a man who would, years later, be entrusted with overseeing the investigation into the causes of 9/11 – Robert S. Mueller III.

In the case of BCCI, Mueller had steered the case along the manageable “official” contours, away from the seamier aspects of American foreign policy, ensuring that the domestic aspect of this worldwide fraud would only singe the toes of two well-connected, designated patsies – Clark Clifford and Robert Altman. And while Morgenthau’s New York office had indeed pushed the envelope in investigating BCCI, as always, the essential integrity – the goodness - of the American political/intelligence apparatus was left intact.

The real scandal of BCCI, however, was not simply that it was a worldwide Ponzi scheme defrauding its investors of billions – for that is the “limited”, official version – but that, in the context of 9/11, it provides a glaring spotlight on the very networks most intimately connected with the corruption. BCCI, the brainchild of British intelligence, was the ideal tool by which a supra-national network of compromised politicians and corrupt officials would “play ball”, fattened up with a stream of capital furnished through the fruits of drugs, arms, and terrorism.

As Oliver North had pioneered the use of the counter-terrorism office in dealing with narco-terrorists like Monzer al-Kassar (connected to the Pan Am explosion over Lockerbie), would it be such a stretch to posit that the counter-terror apparatus – this time under Richard Clarke and John O’Neill – was once again being employed to “work” the corrupt networks wrought by BCCI? Can it be a mere coincidence that the arteries of the bin Laden strain of terrorism were fed not by Iran or Syria – the “traditional” sponsors of the more low-key types of terrorism in the `80’s – but rather by those very countries that have long served as agents and proxies of their American-Anglo cohorts in crime: Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and the United Arab Emirates (i.e. the principal countries fronting for BCCI)? Could it be that the mutually corrupt global relationships wrought by BCCI persist to this day, with a bevy of compromised political officials standing ready to make their contribution to the New World Order – and perhaps scam some extra pocket change on the side?

As they say – follow the money. And where are the big movers and shakers of 9/11 – those who are interpreting the threat for you – putting their money? In vaccines, pharmaceuticals, bio-tech, utilities, security consulting, and surveillance technologies. In other words, they are shifting their money toward those burgeoning industries where they can simply legislate the market need – the favored modus operandi of the “Establishment” captains of industry who had formerly used their clout in the political sector to secure their all-important interests in the oil and banking sectors.

And what of FBI Director Robert Mueller? Was it a coincidence that he was consistently chosen to oversee cases in which the whole bloody mess – Gotti, BCCI, Noriega et al – had threatened to spill over the “officially” designated sides? Was it a result of happenstance that Mueller officially had taken up his job as FBI Director only one week before September 11? Is it Mueller’s job to cover the paper trails – or just cover them up?

Yeah, it’s looking really bad for my WH theory. But I do think he is at least a leveraged BH.