I thought Mueller just said because a sitting president can’t be indicted they didn’t bother to look at obstruction of justice therefore because they chose not to look into it they couldn’t rule it out. Is that the doublespeak I just heard?
I thought Mueller just said because a sitting president can’t be indicted they didn’t bother to look at obstruction of justice therefore because they chose not to look into it they couldn’t rule it out. Is that the doublespeak I just heard?
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Throughout this whole deal there has been a lot of comment about how to get bonafide evidence estabished on the record in court or grand jury acceptable form.
In today’s hearing I kept noticing a reoccurring theme: several congress critters posed a line of questions to mueller about “indicting a sitting president”.
Mueller & pretty much everyone agreed you can’t indict a sitting
At the same time they all agreed YOU COULD INDICT A FORMER POTUS
Could this be setting the table for coming indictments on bubba or Barack hussein bin soetoro??
Mueller answered “ yes, can do, but gotta look into statutes of limitations”
Whadda ya think?