Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump complains of 'crazed' media coverage over 'send her back' chants
The Hill ^ | 07-19-19 | Brett Samuels

Posted on 07/19/2019 12:04:34 PM PDT by Monrose72

President Trump on Friday bemoaned the amount of media coverage devoted to supporters at his Wednesday night rally chanting "send her back" about Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) as he dug in on his attacks against the first-term congresswomen and three of her colleagues. Trump fired off a trio of tweets in which he shifted blame for the uproar over the chants onto the media one day after he sought to distance himself from the refrain. He again accused Omar of hating the country and blasted "vile and disgusting statements" made by progressive lawmakers he has attacked for six consecutive days. "It is amazing how the Fake News Media became 'crazed' over the chant 'send her back' by a packed Arena (a record) crowd in the Great State of North Carolina, but is totally calm & accepting of the most vile and disgusting statements made by the three Radical Left Congresswomen," Trump tweeted.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Local News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bot; chant; omar; sendherback; trump; whinerinchief
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: reasonisfaith

The principle you’re defending here is making fun of people because of the way they look.

******************

That’s a flat out, bald faced lie.

What we’re mocking are people who openly and aggressively state their hatred of the US of A and all it stands for.

I, for one, add in everyone stupid enough to support them.

Welcome to that club.


41 posted on 07/21/2019 9:20:39 AM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Hey, I just realized this isn't the thread we were arguing on. this is the thread where nopardons was beating you up. And you want to morph it into the thread where Bagster is beating you up.

Ya big goof.


42 posted on 07/21/2019 9:30:58 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Progressives do this, because their ideology is stupid.

And before you show me your magic argument powers, consider this.

Not only have you accepted the derp's terms of your surrender by refusing to engage them using the weapons they use, but you have adopted their language.

"Progressives" is not a thing, it is a derp construct and a lie. One that you will never catch coming out of my mouth.

The acceptable term for all things 'left', 'liberal', democrat, and rino is 'derp stater' or more simply, 'derp'.

Once you adopt their language and given up your ability to fight and call it virtue, you have already lost. You have allowed them to set the rules of engagement.

I don't use the derp rule book. I make up my own. I recommend you do the same.

Okay. Ready for your awesome secret argument power. Begin.


43 posted on 07/21/2019 9:44:32 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
You have verred off into a quite a different topic...unless you are once again left handedly inferring that I am an "anti-American; which is patently ridiculous and obscenely offensive.

I wasn't going to poke you in the eye with any more facts, re that Trump's day later claim/distancing himself from his base; however,on Friday, in the Oval Office, he flipped and said that saw nothing wrong with that chant. So he came full circle and with this post, it's really past time to put this discussion to bed.

44 posted on 07/21/2019 12:08:26 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: bagster; Grimmy

It’s not hard to understand.

Once you make fun of people because of the way they look, you’re doing the thing you thought you were fighting against.

That is, if you’re really an American patriot.


45 posted on 07/26/2019 7:18:47 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: bagster; Grimmy

When truth and ridicule are opposed to one another, truth wins every time.

Truth outlives ridicule. Honesty and sincerity can fit into any conversation or communication, no matter the mood, tone or context.

Ridicule on the other hand is quite limited.


46 posted on 07/26/2019 7:24:54 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

For Trump, the whole thing was a win. A win-win, if you will.

His supporters got the chance to yell send her back.

Trump, who understands his position as Chief Executive very clearly, was able to verbalize that he didn’t like the chant. And he won politically.

By this point, the anti-Americans have caught on that they aren’t going to be able to use Trump’s comments about the chant to split him from his supporters.


47 posted on 07/26/2019 7:28:07 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: bagster

I’m getting ready to start lifting again. Shoulder injury. Sometimes all you need is stretching to get things right.

This time I’m going for 197%.

After that, 203.


48 posted on 07/26/2019 7:30:18 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Monrose72

Trump never should have said he disapproved of the ‘send her back’ chants because every time it happens at future rallies the media is going to beat him up over it some more.


49 posted on 07/26/2019 7:36:44 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

But you forget—the Trump against Media score is something like 223 to 0.

(spoiler alert: Trump Wins)


50 posted on 07/26/2019 8:19:34 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bagster

But liberals are the ones who squabble over semantics.


51 posted on 07/26/2019 8:37:51 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
When truth and ridicule are opposed to one another, truth wins every time. Truth outlives ridicule. Honesty and sincerity can fit into any conversation or communication, no matter the mood, tone or context.

I got one for ya.

Q: Is it better to be loved or feared.

A: That’s a good question. It’s nice to be both, but it’s very difficult. But if I had my choice, I would rather be feared. Fear lasts longer than love.

So, using geometric logic, I win, you lose.

Next argument.


52 posted on 07/26/2019 8:48:13 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
This time I’m going for 197%.

Don't you dare. You'll ruin everything.

Do you realize that, right after that night, the night of the best internet flame war of all times, Q made a post with 188 periods in a long line?

True story.

Don't jinx America. Stick to 188%.

#QanonIsEverywhere


53 posted on 07/26/2019 8:51:31 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
But liberals are the ones who squabble over semantics.

Not true. Everybody does. We just do it better, as in all things.

But if you insist, then stop squabbling and do as you're told. You don't wanna sound like a liberal, right?

#YourLogicIsSound


54 posted on 07/26/2019 8:54:56 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: bagster

If it means that much to you, I’ll reconsider. In fact, I concede for your sake.

(If I get to 197 by accident, I just won’t mention it here.)


55 posted on 07/26/2019 8:59:38 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Many people have no fear of being ridiculed. What then?

Besides, based on your behavior on this forum, I don’t believe you would rather be feared than loved.


56 posted on 07/26/2019 9:02:34 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
(If I get to 197 by accident, I just won’t mention it here.)

Whew. The world is saved.

If it means that much to you, I’ll reconsider.

You have a hard time with sarcasm, bruh.

But seriously. Don't mention it. You'll ruin everything.

🤪


57 posted on 07/26/2019 9:09:52 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Many people have no fear of being ridiculed. What then?

Apples and oranges. We are dwelling in the philosophical realm now.

You put forth an either/or scenario (ridicule/truth) and I countered with another (loved/feared).

We are coming at this thing from two different levels of understanding. And maybe never the twain shall meet. We super geniuses often face this problem when dealing with you mortals.

Ponder on this conversation, and in time things may clarify themselves.

Don't be too disappointed if they don't, though.

You are in good company.


58 posted on 07/26/2019 9:14:39 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Besides, based on your behavior on this forum, I don’t believe you would rather be feared than loved.

I have to tell you. I am immune to cheap, pseudo-psychological parlor tricks.

But I am entertained by them.


59 posted on 07/26/2019 9:16:36 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: bagster

What if I wasn’t being sarcastic?


60 posted on 07/26/2019 9:22:07 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson