[onyx]

There was NOTHING wrong with the chant.

[mrmeyer]

Right. Either way, who cares?

[nopardons]

EXACTLY!

[Lakeshark]

I loved the chant!

[Segovia]

Exactly! were I there, I’d have started the chant. I just hope the Donald doesn’t wimp out and back down, that bunch of bitches all needs sent SOMEWHERE!

[luvbach1]

There was NOTHING wrong with the chant.

That's correct for more than one reason. If the charge that she married her bro to qualify for emigration is true, she committed disqualifying fraud. Wait, she is an American citizen, the Democrats and their Media sycophants cry! But it's obvious she lied when she pledged allegiance to the flag (as every new citizen is required to do). She has not given the slightest indication of her allegiance to the USA, quite to the contrary; therefore, her pledge of allegiance is null and void, as should be her claim to American citizenship.

[JohnBovenmyer]

True, but would be better for him to say that he doesn't know the truth, but that there are seemingly well documented media reports claiming she's committed several crimes for which imprisonment or even conceivably revocation of citizenship and deportation might be her penalties. Point out she's innocent until proven guilty, and deserves due process of the law; but such serious allegations also deserve to be investigated, openly and honestly, especially in view of the importance of her high position. No one is above the rule of law. Then start a "Rule of Law" chant.

What could the 'Rats do in response? Suddenly claim investigating potentially crooked politicians was racist?!! That would get as far with the public as I could throw Jerry Nadler, before his surgery.

[ThePatriotsFlag]

...agree. “Lock her up” was ok, but “Send her back” Is not? This is another media nothingburger.