UFO - "Only You Can Rock Me" (1978)
Posted on 07/07/2019 6:34:08 PM PDT by robowombat
I’m not really into this stuff I got over it a long time ago, but I have a friend who really is and he bombards me with UFO stuff.
Anyway I don’t think they would or do brief the president over this stuff no matter who it is, and if they do the president realizes what a disaster it would be for whatever reasons to release it publicly so they don’t. I’ve heard it said that Jimmy Carter was one of the few who asked and was briefed on the subject, and he had an extreme reaction and was seen later crying/contemplating at his desk afterward, perhaps because of his religious beliefs.
Anyway who knows
“If you’ve been curious about what President Trump thinks about UFO’s [sic]”
Nope. Not one bit.
Ah...she’s cute.
If only she had a brain.
I was at a private dinner with Donald Rumsfeld 12 years ago and we had a very interesting and pleasant side conversation. He evaded the question of UFO’s when brought that up in our conversation. My brother was also present and I gave him a summary of our UFO conversation. My brother said that I got my answer.
Rumsfeld did not consider me a nutcase (he got the question about UFO’s frequently). He and is wife invited me to join them for dinner in Washington D.C.
Here is a photo I took of my buddy being abducted. He was released later on and mentioned being probed but would not go into detail.....
https://www.newshub.co.nz/dam/form-uploaded-images-ordered/2019/04/28/GettyImages-983316824-aliens-ufo-1120.jpg
“....who want to believe without real evidence.”
I giggle about this thing about evidence. For that I have two questions: 1. If you were driving into a town that is violently killing each other, would you hold still to be seen easily? And if our visitors are smart enough to get here, they are probably smart enough to know not to get into it. And 2. With all the millions of planets and solar systems in the many universes we live near, do you really think we are the only place with some type of life, intelligent or otherwise? And I’m not sure we qualify for the first one possibility.
rwood
Thanks fieldmarshaldj. Great, now I've got that Monkees tune (Neil Diamond, songwriter) running through my mind. I'm trying to drown it out with Bach's Goldberg Variations.
I never really get into this because it is hard to prove, and a waste of time. Although I finally decided to take another look at it. Probably the first time in over 20 years.
Anyway, I watched two documentaries about it.
First was, “Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers”.
It was interesting, but put me asleep towards the end.
The second was “Unacknowledged” which is actually pretty good. This even though some Leftist are in the film and I had to briefly listen to talk about UFOs. The last 30 minutes puts a nice bow on it.
Ford and Billy Jeff also requested to be briefed. Apparently Billy Jeff got stonewalled on Majestic 12 information.
and a camera on every device and full-motion video as wel
Yep. When these phones cane out I said “We’re going to find out what there is to ghosts and UFOs”. Both now debunked now as far as I’m concerned.
Trump...or any president for that matter...would be privy to any and all intel regarding UFO’s. The only possible hitch would be if the agencies in possession of the info would hide it.
The Nephillim of Gen chapter 6.
If anyone has any extra cash to burn in their pockets I highly recommend Ailen Encounters by Dr. Chuck Missler and Dr. Mark Eastman as well as the Judgment of Nepillim by Ryan Pitterson
...Belief can exist without proof; but it must emphatically avoid proof to remain belief....
“...Belief can exist without proof; but it must emphatically avoid proof to remain belief....”
Maybe, but belief is based upon education level and provision of examples until the example is allowed to existence. (Saul Alinsky) If something is said enough in the public domain, it becomes fact because people don’t care unless it effects them. So if I tell you I saw something that is against the grain of people with an agenda, they will attack the messenger after they can’t disprove the fact I saw it. So direct proof itself is based upon the perception of what is talked about, not what I saw.
A perfect example are the groups coming out now trying to disclaim the holocaust. There are names, documents, displays, pictures, knowledgeable relatives....more than enough evidence to proof it’s existence. But some are trying to gain traction in the media, all who weren’t even born when it happened, to verbally, only, with far outgunned proof, to say it didn’t happen. But that’s the chance you take when you erase logic, to include proof, and substitute it with antipathy of the messenger and not disproof of the occurrence. Perception is a two sided sword with one side sharper than the other. And that depends on who is sharpening it, not the sword.
Well, at least no mention of President Trump being a Daydream Believer who’s about to take the Last Train to Clarksville.
=running away=
Thank you for proving that “...Belief can exist without proof; but it must emphatically avoid proof to remain belief....”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
