Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RooRoobird20

“The Princess and the Frog” cost $105 million and grossed $267 million, that’s not called a bust.
BTW it’s a cute movie, I bought the blu-ray.


54 posted on 07/03/2019 4:53:22 PM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Varda

I watched the movie, didn’t like it at all, couldn’t sit through it.

It cost $105 million to make, only brought in $207 million, it was a bomb by Disney standards. The critical reviews were overall negative and several critics declared that “Princess and the Frog” ended the “Disney Renaissance.”


67 posted on 07/03/2019 7:11:04 PM PDT by RooRoobird20 ( "Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: Varda
It was the movie that killed Disney traditional animation.

Cost $105 million to make. Marketing normally figures at least 1/2 of the production cost. Theater owners get 1/2 the ticket price. There is also the distribution cost.

Go into a Disney Store and the only time you see any Princess and the Frog merchandise is when she's a part of the Disney Princesses.

It was definitely a bust.

Disney can certainly absorb that kind of loss, but they don't like it.

68 posted on 07/03/2019 7:20:32 PM PDT by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson