Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

7 MINUTES ON THE DANGERS OF 5G FROM THE GUY INSTALLING IT!
Unknown ^ | 6/30/2019 | anon

Posted on 06/30/2019 11:57:20 AM PDT by Dick Bachert

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: newfreep

That ol’ clamshell phone of mine would melt from 5G.


41 posted on 06/30/2019 5:36:40 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
FROM THE GUY INSTALLING IT!

So why is he INSTALLING IT?

42 posted on 06/30/2019 5:39:45 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“It really depends on power. “

No, it depends on frequency.


43 posted on 06/30/2019 6:30:52 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
"You really,REALLY need to see this one!"

"Five things YOU NEED TO KNOW about 5G!"

1) G!
2) G!
3) G!
4) G!, and finally...
5) G!

44 posted on 06/30/2019 8:13:19 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
The health risks suspected around 5G may have merit or NOT. The problem I have with internet personas presenting potential 5G health hazards is they present them as if the hazards were factual rather than hypothetical. They weave a yarn based on a few known facts about RF energy at higher spectrum levels and its dissipative properties at those levels and make conclusions without testing which means they evade the scientific method and simply assert their opinion as scientific truth. It's the same reasoning process that gives the political arena global warming hysteria.

There are physical scientists that study and test RF effects on lab animals. There are many such scientists. They are not squelched by big bad sinister 5G lords. They have not ignored the potential dangers to the human population. They are testing now and they are not finding a solid cause and effect to report.

Here are some prominent voices from the scientific community on the subject of 5G:

Dr. Steve Novella, an assistant professor of neurology at Yale and the editor of Science-Based Medicine, understands that people generally get concerned about radiation. “Using the term radiation is misleading because people think of nuclear weapons—they think of ionizing radiation that absolutely can cause damage. It can kill cells. It can cause DNA mutations.” But since non-ionizing radiation doesn’t cause DNA damage or tissue damage, Novella says that most concern about cell phone RFR is misplaced. “There’s no known mechanism for most forms of non-ionizing radiation to even have a biological effect,” he says.

It’s easy to find claims online that the greater frequency of 5G alone constitutes a risk. RadiationHealthRisks.com observes that “1G, 2G, 3G and 4G use between 1 to 5 gigahertz frequency. 5G uses between 24 to 90 gigahertz frequency,” and then asserts that “Within the RF Radiation portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, the higher the frequency, the more dangerous it is to living organisms.”

But asserting that the higher frequency is more dangerous is just that—an assertion, and there’s little real science to stand behind it. 5G remains non-ionizing in nature.

So there is no conclusive study regarding 5G health effects but there is strong evidence that too much sun exposure is a far greater threat than the 5G hysterically asserted claims of how big bad tech is going to kill us all in accordance with Agenda 21, Agenda 30, etc. Although claims of sinister UN agendas have merit, it is the 5G internet pundit class that is associating and injecting hysteria of 5G into sinister aspects of UN globalist groups. As such pundits are want to do, they mix valid concerns into their unfounded premises to heighten the drama.

I will continue to read better sources about 5G that are genuinely concerned about possible 5G health risks and will ignore the internet pseudoscience.

45 posted on 06/30/2019 11:21:08 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Looks like the Spawn of Strzok!


46 posted on 07/01/2019 4:44:18 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“For example, radar uses an ionizing tube to block high power radar waves from the magnetron and allows the low power reflected waves to use the same antenna and waveguide.”

Source?


47 posted on 07/01/2019 9:23:59 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

48 posted on 07/01/2019 9:26:09 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

I’m an electrical engineer with attack radar repair training. In radar repair training, we went through every circuit on the radar. Even though it was 37 years ago, I specifically remember the special section of waveguide that ionized when the radar transmit pulse struck it to allow the same waveguide to be used for both transmit and receive.


49 posted on 07/02/2019 5:14:37 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Where does it say in the Constitution anyone is entitled to the property another has labored for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“that ionized when the radar transmit pulse struck it”

Radar wives are non-ionizing.

I am a Nuclear Engineer with extensive training in the field of ionizing radiation.


50 posted on 07/02/2019 5:42:42 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Radar wives are non-ionizing.

That's why so many guys are choosing to stay single.

51 posted on 07/02/2019 5:47:45 PM PDT by bankwalker (Immigration without assimilation is an invasion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson