Surely, this will be reviewed by the DNC, and Nancy Pelosi will not sign off on Kamala as a certified eligible candidate (as she did for Obama) without being certain this is all OK.
/S
and PS: Any protests about this will be rejected by the courts as not being ripe, timely, or having proper standing, because she will not have been elected. And after, it would be a Republican attempt to “reverse an election.”
Since when do the DNC, or the RNC, or Nancy Pelosi, or Mitch McConnell, or anyone else have to certify candidates as eligible?
“Any protests about this will be rejected by the courts as not being ripe, timely, or having proper standing, because she will not have been elected.”
Well, THAT is exactly on point.
There are no Presidential elections in the Constitution, no “running”, no primaries, no conventions, no parties.
No Federal court would hear an eligibility challenge until an ineligible person was going to be sworn in (and rightly so), and if Congress certified the election without dissent (as they did on January 6, 2009 for “Obama”) no court in the land would dare interfere.