Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/27/2019 8:15:06 AM PDT by Monrose72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Monrose72


2 posted on 06/27/2019 8:18:55 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Monrose72

Recycled news for blog clicks.


3 posted on 06/27/2019 8:19:13 AM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Monrose72

Leftists often label their actions neutral or unbiased because they regard their opinions as unquestionable, objective truths. It a telltale of zealotry typical of cults.


4 posted on 06/27/2019 8:19:38 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Monrose72

The stunning lack of self-awareness by Google staff - 2 of the 3 people smeared as alt-right Nazis are orthodox Jews (Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager).

This is proof that liberals smear anyone they don’t like with the term.


5 posted on 06/27/2019 9:03:49 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Monrose72

Grubering


6 posted on 06/27/2019 9:04:22 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Monrose72
Once in a while the ACLU gets one right:

Nadine Strossen, a law professor and former president of the American Civil Liberties Union.

“Even if we have content moderation that is enforced with the noblest principles and people are striving to be fair and impartial, it is impossible,” she said, testifying at the June 26 House hearing. “These so-called standard are irreducibly subjective. What is one person’s hate speech … is somebody else’s cherished loving speech.”

“I did read every single word of Facebook’s [content policing] standards and the more you read them, the more complicated it is. And no two Facebook enforcers agree with each other and none of us would either. So that means that we are entrusting to some other authority the power to make decisions that should reside in each of us as individuals, as to what we choose to see and what we choose not to see and what we choose to use our own free speech rights to respond to.”

Though private companies, even the ones as large and influential as Google and Facebook, are not bound to protect free speech for the individual, “it is incredibly important that they be encouraged to do so,” she said.

7 posted on 06/27/2019 9:07:32 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Monrose72
Though private companies, even the ones as large and influential as Google and Facebook, are not bound to protect free speech for the individual, “it is incredibly important that they be encouraged to do so,” she said.

It's no longer a free speech issue, it's a deceptive advertising issue. If a product's marketing is deceptive, it's false advertising and illegal.

If Google's contract is that, for the "price" of letting Google mine your data you get a service that lets you get superior search results, and then Google reneges on that by tilting those results in their favor to manipulate you, that's deceptive.

It's almost like old-time subliminal advertising where you think you are paying for a movie, but you don't know that frames of product were spliced into the film such that you were being manipulated into wanting the product.

In the Google case, you're being manipulated into thinking you're getting a true search result, when in fact you're being socially manipulated by those results.

It's subliminal, and it was made illegal in the past.

-PJ

9 posted on 06/27/2019 9:28:58 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Monrose72

George Orwell could not have foreseen google and facebook, but he got it right about thought control and harassing people for their views.


13 posted on 06/27/2019 9:44:55 AM PDT by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


15 posted on 06/27/2019 9:56:29 AM PDT by bitt (US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Monrose72

The new craze is “Woke Capitalism.” Big business is cracking down if you’re not on the far left!


31 posted on 06/27/2019 6:05:27 PM PDT by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson