The way you put it, using terms like “incel” and “can’t get laid”, strongly implies that you find promiscuity to be a virtue, since you dismiss the author on the basis of not successfully being promiscuous.
You should be aware that promiscuity-as-normal is a noxious and degenerate standard. That’s the Left’s agenda.
Conservatives view non-marital sex as a dangerous and undesirable behavior. From this point of view, the very idea of “incel” does not exist, and “can’t get laid” is not an issue because he shouldn’t be doing that before marriage.
And I think that is really the core of the complaint, not that he can’t get laid, but that the incidence of marriageability in women in Western countries is at a historical minimum, because they have taken on so many coarse and masculine traits and abandoned the natural femininity that makes men want to pursue them in the first place.
No, i just think that sex is normal and that people are happier when they find someone to share that part of life with, and that a lot of young men today appear to have no idea how to form relationships with women, and then proceed to blame women for their own abject failings as human beings, and then rather than changing their minds or their behaviors, blaming other people and getting angrier and angrier rather than adapting to their environments as humans have always done, at least those who have successfully survived to reproduce.
And by the way, “incel” is what these warped failures at life call themselves, not a term invented by communists.
“It’s not time to make a change
Just relax, take it easy
You’re still young, that’s your fault
There’s so much you have to know
Find a girl, settle down
If you want you can marry
Look at me, I am old, but I’m happy
You make a strong moral argument but stripped of morals humans have an unceasing mating cycle which causes us no end of problems. But I agree, without a moral compass we’re no better than animals.