Of course they do. That's because historians ARE the problem.

PGA Weblog ^

[nicollo]

That's a Newsweek reporter asking people about this when she already knows what they'll say.

Perhaps in this article, but, come on, x, tell us about the latest AHA convention. Same crap, same disoriented socialism, same self-loathing, and same Zinn-centric, Marxist world view.

See here for the last convention (all gender bathrooms required): https://www.historians.org/annual-meeting/program

Some highlights:

Evangelical Loyalties Reconsidered: A Roundtable on Sex, Power, and the Media in the Study of American Evangelicalism

Secret Liaisons and Disloyalty: Space and Gender in Progressive-Era New York

"Chairman Fred Lives”: The Life and Legacies of Fred Hampton, Illinois Black Panther Party Chairman

Orientalism and Its Discontents: Rethinking Approaches to Islam and Islamic Studies in Modern Europe Strategies, Survival, and the Social History of Economic Depressions in 20th-Century Africa and the Indian Ocean World

Rethinking Freedom and Manumission in Latin America and the Atlantic World

Queer Encounters with the US Legal System in the 20th Century

Anti-imperialist Loyalties in the Interwar and the Cold War Years, Part 1: The Interwar Years

So lame.