Posted on 06/20/2019 7:25:32 PM PDT by rktman
The diversity enforcers at Netflix has decided that viewers havent been hammered with enough LGBTQIA+ representation. Apparently, last years 53 shows with LGBT characters werent enough. To remedy this gross inequity, Netflix signed a major deal with transgender activist Janet Mock yesterday.
Mock -- director, writer, and producer of FXs Pose -- has been given a three-year multimillion-dollar pact that gives her the power to develop and call creative shots for new shows at the largest streaming service. According to Variety:
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
There isn’t enough?
Guess not. Sheesh!
Tranny zombies? dolphins? Tune in to find out!
Another man taking a woman’s job.
Do people actually watch that mess? I dumped Netflix when they hired Obama.
We are swirling around the edge of the galactic toilet bowl!
Barack and the Mooch are a perfect fit for Netflix.
Will the real bosses of Netflix please stand up?
Okay, now walk out of the room, and keep on moving.
I ain't dumping Netflix. There's too many good shows and movies on and it's still a great deal at $13/month.
BUT MUH! YOU'RE FUNDING HOLLYWOOD LIBERALS! Yeah well, you know what, you're funding the Left simply by having an internet connection, so my $13/month ain't gonna make a difference either way.
Versity needs to die.
Netflix already loses money on all of their original content, they don’t care about losing money. They are willing to tolerate significant losses to promote the LGBT agenda. Most of Corporate America is now “Woke Capital”. This agenda isn’t going away because it’s what Wall Street wants.
Haha
yeah, no.
If you subscribe, you pay for this.
Same with cable.
This month, Psychology Ptooey was shaming those who won’t date crossdressers.
Has Twitter ever turned a profit?
Salon’s stock went down below a dollar and still the wealthy Left were funding it annually to keep it around.
Dat’s nuffin! I quit when they hired Susan Rice!
And I havent missed it for a second.
Nope. Neither has YouTube, which is why Google bought it to keep it pumped up with revenues from other divisions. Social media is not profitable in general, so what reason do they have to invest billions in this other than propaganda and mind control?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.