To: All
Good thing he wasn't 'on duty':
Would have been required to shoot a dog too.
(I'm generally pro-police, but it had been getting easier and easier to find fault the last several years)
To: LegendHasIt
(I'm generally pro-police, but it had been getting easier and easier to find fault the last several years) Me too, but the amount of vile interactions seems to be decreasing in the past couple years.
17 posted on
06/15/2019 1:53:03 PM PDT by
null and void
(Stamp out philately!)
To: LegendHasIt
(I'm generally pro-police, but it had been getting easier and easier to find fault the last several years)[.]
I support law enforcement. In my mind, that doesn't mean supporting bully cops, or cops who are more than willing to shoot first and avoid questions later, or who walk around with rage on their sleeves.
And I certainly don't support those who practice antagonism toward police officers (and I admit that there are jerk police officers, as my statements above), and call themselves, First Amendment auditors.
But there is something going wrong in law enforcement. There are many, many YouTube videos that show this. Time was, the cop on patrol in your area was your friend. Now, this, unfortunately, may no longer be true.
One YouTube critic has an interesting observation: many YouTube videos show paunchy, bald cops. Many police officers exhibit rapid muscle/weight gain, enlarged breasts (in men), paranoia, hyperactivity, and male pattern baldness.
They are continually in a state or rage.
Those are all signs of steroid rage.
Yet, often when someone points these things out, they are accused of trying to bring down the police officers.
I think many police officers are in states of 'roid rage. They need help.
52 posted on
06/15/2019 3:23:35 PM PDT by
righttackle44
(Takes scalps. Leave the bodies as a warning.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson