Yes to tax cuts. (Which John Stossel likes).
Yes to deregulation. (Which Stossel also likes).
No to corporate welfare. (Which Stossel hates).
No to taxpayer-funded subsidies (Which Stossel also hates).
No to free trade if it leads to manufacturing jobs going overseas.
There is no such thing as Free Trade.
Free trade ain't free. Prior to President Trump there were millions of former manufacturing workers paying the price for 'Free Trade'.
>
Yes to tax cuts. (Which John Stossel likes).
Yes to deregulation. (Which Stossel also likes).
No to corporate welfare. (Which Stossel hates).
No to taxpayer-funded subsidies (Which Stossel also hates).
No to free trade if it leads to manufacturing jobs going overseas.
>
It wasn’t ‘free trade’ that lead to biz fleeing the U.S., but it’s illegal, leviathan GOVT (ala DoI “He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.”). Even ‘deregulation’ didn’t mean the TOMES of unconstitutional rules/regs/notices/edicts and the like, let alone their creators, were removed from the equation.
As for tax cuts, that would be automatic once govt was restored to its rightful size/scope (yeah, yeah, we’re still dreaming here, I know).
As for subsidies & welfare (I repeat myself), again they fall into the illegal, unconstitutional side of the equation. Biz would, once again, rise and fall on its own merit.
Tucker is a free and fair market advocate. What Tucker also realizes is that national security and theft of intellectual property is of paramount importance.