Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: struggle

The most interesting thing Barr (PrisonBarrs) said was that Huber had done nothing in over a year. He stood aside for Horowitz . . . who could do nothing except report.

So all the stuff over a year that “Huber is coming” was a joke.

Now, I do believe PrisonBarrs is “more” serious about looking into this, but a reality bath came last week when an unnamded Deputy Assistant Director (almost certainly Peter Stzrok-—Deep Stroke) was given a pass: “declined to prosecute” was the phrase.

Folks, if they can’t get Deep Stroke, they can’t get anybody. So I have a feeling-—and I really hope I’m wrong-—that Bull Durham and PrisonBarrs will find a ton of inconsistencies, non-standarad behavior, blah, blah boilerplate language, but will “decline to prosecute.”

Oh, and remember last year we had a similar unnamed FBI agent and “decline to prosecute?” And the Awans? “Decline to prosecute?”


79 posted on 06/01/2019 7:08:25 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LS

If Barr let Peter Strozk off, then I have NO HOPE in ANYTHING BEING DONE!!


86 posted on 06/01/2019 10:11:24 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson