Then how do you explain the only DNA found
was that of the guy who later confessed?
Ask Eric Reynolds, he’ll tell you all about it.....
https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000554394565&ref=content_filter
Anne Coulter addressed that point (kind of) back about a year ago - not sure if you’d find it convincing, but it sounded reasonable to me:
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2018-07-25.html
The most telling point so far as I was concerned was that apparently the punishment that the guy who confessed got was exactly nothing - and the other five (who it sure sounds like participated in that assault) ended up as multi-millionaires.
Exactly. If the injury on one of the accused face was from her scratching him, DNA would have been found under her nails.