Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ifinnegan

Before I retired from my Pentagon job (2013), I went to a building meeting and the topic of emotional dogs came up. There for years had been a rule in place that the only dogs allowed on the grounds (within the structure) would be guard dogs and seeing-eye dogs. At some point after 2005, they rewrote the regulation and allowed emotional dogs (you had to apply for the waiver to enter).

So at some point, there was a dog-on-dog fight (two emotional dogs in conflict, if you can imagine this). So the management of the building sat and down to review this. They had roughly forty people who were bringing in their dogs now. This was on a upward trend. Management then kinda admitted....the building, the lengthy hallways, and the limited grounds....just weren’t made for a massive number of dogs.

All of this was leading to a point where they’d have to make the rules more stringent, and make this support animal business more regulatory.


97 posted on 05/29/2019 9:10:19 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice

Dog on dog sounds very bully

My bulldogs were always dog aggressive


123 posted on 05/29/2019 11:19:50 PM PDT by wardaddy (I applaud Jim Robinson for his comments on the Southern Monuments decision ...thank you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson