Then you would be correct in saying it is unconstitutional. The only thing stopping congress now is politics. But that is true for every law they pass. After a law is passed then a plaintiff with standing can bring a case to the unconstitutionality of the law, but only then.
Get it?
Get over yourself, you arrogant prick.
in order to make it unconstitutional for congress to pass a law
WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG.
You don't "pass a law" to make something unconstitutional. Congress must be granted the authority to do something. See Article 1 for a list of those things. If Congress is not granted the authority to do something, that authority is reserved to the States or to the People.
Amendment 10:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
You couldn't be more wrong about the actual intent of the Constitution if you were actually trying to be wrong.
Then you would be correct in saying it is unconstitutional.
I AM correct on this matter. Have you ever even read the Constitution? You show absolutely no evidence thereof.
The only thing stopping congress now is politics.
The Congress, the courts, and a succession of Presidents have colluded to ignore the Constitution. They are operating illegally ... a fact that should be obvious ... pretending otherwise is idiotic.
That doesn't make their misconduct "Constitutional". It makes their conduct unlawful.
Get it?