Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EdnaMode
What part of “month to month” is so hard to grasp. The tenant needed to lease the property for a longer term. This story is entirely disingenuous. The women is not being evicted. The landlord is not renewing the lease and giving three months advance notice. Landlord is being more than fair.
32 posted on 05/24/2019 10:19:44 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: precisionshootist

It seems most assume that all landlords are wealthy and all decisions are made to increase that wealth regardless of the poor tenants’ needs.

Not all who own rental properties are wealthy. My dad bought some as a long term investment and much of my childhood was spent barely getting by ourselves. There weren’t piles of cash to rely on when tenants didn’t pay or were late.

I know several people who have bought a rental property in a college town so that their kids could live there during their college years. Before and after that time, the properties were rented to others.

For all we know, this landlord bought the property years ago with the intention of having his daughter live there at this time in her life. Why should his plans for his property change? And at 102 she must have grandkids and great grandkids, why aren’t they helping an elderly family member?


54 posted on 05/24/2019 11:02:35 AM PDT by NorthstarMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson