Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: kiryandil

I have no idea. How can I look that up. Obviously I’m in Alabama so it’s a TVA plant. Will any of them be safe on a long term power outage? Cooling pools, onsite waste holding ....

None of what I am saying is negative to nuclear power. Our waste handling in this country is flawed.


86 posted on 05/21/2019 5:22:31 PM PDT by wgmalabama (Mittens is the new Juan. Go away mittens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: wgmalabama
Our waste handling in this country is flawed.

Carter pulled a fast one with waste handling to try to kill nuclear power.

I believe that Browns Ferry [commissioned 1974-1977, BWR (Boiling Water Reactor)] and Joseph M. Farley [commissioned 1977-1981 PWR (Pressurized Water Reactor)] are both Generation II reactors.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/reaction/readings/rossin.html

On April 7, 1977, President Jimmy Carter announced that the United States would defer indefinitely the reprocessing of spent nuclear reactor fuel. He stated that after extensive examination of the issues, he had reached the conclusion that this action was necessary to reduce the serious threat of nuclear weapons proliferation, and that by setting this example, the U. S. would encourage other nations to follow its lead.

President Carter's Executive Order also announced that the U. S. would sponsor an international examination of alternative fuel cycles, seeking to identify approaches which would allow nuclear power to continue without adding to the risk of nuclear proliferation. More than thirty nations participated over almost three years. But no new magic answer could be found.

Some other nations went ahead with reprocessing and breeder development, but high costs and loss of political support delayed plans in many nuclear projects around the world. The U. S. never regained its technological lead in nuclear energy development, its own nuclear power program had already gone from orders to cancellations, and the dream of long-term future energy security from breeder reactors faded away. The three years of uncertainty about the future had wiped away further prospects for private investments in the nuclear fuel cycle. Today, twenty years later, all U.S. spent fuel remains in storage at each plant where it was used.

87 posted on 05/21/2019 5:56:15 PM PDT by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson