Another oxymoron.
Sharia law compliant. Since Islam is at heart a crude form of socialism, the fact that right to quiet enjoyment of occupancy of a specified tract of real estate is NOT recognized is very much a part of this “legal” construction.
The Declaration of Independence specifies the “Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”. The third part of this phrase refers to the right to OWNERSHIP of the rights, title and interest of physical possessions, and this includes the intangible right of occupancy of real estate. In one sense, one does not “own” the physical piece of ground, only the bundle of rights that are assigned to the physical and defined locality. The physical attributes are separate and apart from the individual, and the bundle of rights is conferred upon making a contractual agreement recognized by the governing authority.
People simply do not recognize what an affront to the established US Code of statutes on the national, state, and local levels of government is presented by the attempts to establish Sharia law.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg notwithstanding.
Aka ‘Halal finances’. Muslim idea of business do not suppose any creation of added value. Interests are de-juro unislamic too. That’s considered ‘dirty’ or ‘Jewish’ thing. Their idea of ‘just’ business is mostly about to gain access to a valuable resource and to limit access of everyone else to it and then allowing access for dough.