[ALPAPilot]

“You don’t want to put into a document like this gratuitous information about U.S. persons," Baker said moderator Benjamin Wittes. "You want to try to minimize it, to some extent. If it's important. If the assessment is that the identity is critically important and you need it to either follow the flow of the information ... then you might put the person's name in."

But, hey, it's okay to submit patently false scurrilous hearsay. No big deal

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Constitutional Crisis?

[tet68]

no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation,

Someone needs jail time over this, a false oath or affirmation to subject a citizen to investigation
and criminal charges should be punished severely.