Pot Luck Dinner Notable!
Exhibit A
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3743427/posts?page=203#203
Exhibit B
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3749289/posts
There's more but those two were at hand and are a fair starting point.
There are many Q shops all over the Internet and that means we can all find sources we prefer to follow. The few times I read Cates, I had to wade through his many contemptuous snarks at the witlessness of those who do not already agree with him. Last time I read Cates, by the time I returned to the thread I was grumpy and returned the favor by snarking that he won't admit when he's wrong.
I think I should just stay off his threads - he faithfully serves Q and he's on the front lines taking flack like I'll never know, but I think he does alot of collateral damage by laying down surpressing fire like that.
In the earlier days of our threads, I and others pushed back hard on those who were lining up arguments meant to discect/destroy the Q threads one onion layer at a time. Some of those were probably innocents caught in the crossfire, who happened to be pursuing lines of thought that trolls could exploit to bring our threads down. Virtually any request I've made on the thread entails a social "cost", so I've always tried to factor in whether it's needed or not. Therefore, I am no stranger to causing collateral damage myself.
I would like to avoid the "Cates-ification" of our threads. He's enduring agression and threats out on the frontier, fighting the good fight, so maybe his verbal artillarly is key to his survival. But we're in tranquil waters compared with him, and I think we can usually afford to avoid directing the same calibre of incredulity and snark at each other's alternative theories that he does. Opposing opinions and analysis which critiques thinking seems healthy. But I felt like I "needed" to speak my views on [RR] awhile back when some Cates-ification seemed to be setting in.
We stick together, and we're gonna have one HECK of a pot-luck dinner when this is done! :)
Pot Luck Dinner Notable!
Pinging S.W per FR etiquette.
Exhibit A:
I believe Q knew what RR and others were doing re FISA prior to POTUS’ election so that POTUS knew who he was dealing with and what their objectives were.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From what I have read, RR signed one FISA ct application, and has said something along the lines of “It did not say what others are saying it said.” So the FISA stuff RR was involved in is, in the immortal words of Steve W., “TBD”. Q has said more than once “FISA goes both ways”>
Exhibit B:
Despite having full knowledge by then of the heinous abuse of the FISA process by Comey’s FBI, Rosenstein cited no objection to any of that. Matter of fact, Rosenstein was so unconcerned about the use of the fraudulent Steele Dossier as the basis for those FISA warrants – a usage that Comey himself admitted to in sworn congressional testimony – that Rosenstein actually signed the third extension application himself!
Next, Rosenstein made the likely illegal decision to appoint a special counsel to investigate allegations of “Trump/Russia Collusion” despite the conspicuous absence of any underlying crime, a requirement of such appointments. His pick to lead the probably-illegal Witch Hunt was Robert Mueller, a man who is not only a close friend of Rosenstein himself, but also a close friend of Comey, a key witness to any such investigation, the clearest conflicts of interest possible, and clearly disqualifying.
Rosenstein then signed not only one, but two scoping letters to Mueller that he has since worked feverishly to keep out of public view, most likely because those letters also contain clear violations of the special counsel statutes. The then spent a year and a half allowing Mueller to destroy the lives of dozens of American citizens and basically conduct himself as if he were head of an American Gestapo.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I warrant that the writers’ snark and sneer exceeds that of Cates’. :-) Minor point. My actual points:
1. The FISA warrant RR signed has not been made public. When it is, then we will know. Until then, we don’t know what it said or its purpose.
2. The writer makes many statements about RR’s state of mind, motives, and viewpoints, that I would like direct quotes or some other type of clear verification. Otherwise, such opinions remain merely opinions.
3. When Trump interviewed Mueller supposedly for the position of AG, which was obviously false, Sessions and Rosenstein were both at the meeting. So who made the actual decision to appoint (a) as Special Counsel and (b) Mueller in particular, and the why, are still.. TBD.
I posit that it could very well have been in Trump’s interest to get a SC going as he know the Dems were going to continue to go after him, and a SC would absolutely exonerate him as there were no crimes committed by Trump’s campaign. BUT there were gazillions of crimes committed by the Dems/various fed agencies. Which leads to:
4. Since no one who has read RR’s letters to Mueller identifying the scope of the SC investigation has made the contents public, we really have no idea what the scope was.
We DO know that Flynn sacrificed himself in order to deliver legal testimony about crimes he knew to have been committed - that had nothing to do with the Russia Hoax.
Since much of the Exhibit B article is stated as fact but it is really conjecture, I stand firmly in the “TBD” but 99.999% “white hat”. If I am wrong, I will not eat crow as I am a vegetarian, but I will sacrifice similarly and eat (gag) tofu.
Addendum:
Q’s drop about BLOCKADE is very interesting and can be interpreted in more than one way. The Dems might have viewed the blockade one way, but it served another purpose. The derps were fooled into thinking that Mueller was going to find Trump was a criminal so they did not see or know what was going on behind the scenes.
bbb
"""I think I should just stay off his threads - he faithfully serves Q and he's on the front lines taking flack like I'll never know, but I think he does alot of collateral damage by laying down surpressing fire like that."""
--------------------------------------------------------------
Excerpts. EDITS "X" mine:
"I never said that because....I have never followed or paid attention to Q. Nothing I Tweet or put in a column is from Q."
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1110718849563967488
"Xuck Q."
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1051938990641860609
"Actually I don't read Q stuff, from any of the numerous Q's out there. So I have not idea whatsoever what Q is or isn't saying. So stop telling me he/they agree with me or don't agree with me because I don't give a Xhit.
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1051940948891095040
"I've said repeatedly I do not want to see Q stuff.
It is vague.
It is not sourced.
It's an anonymous person say vague stuff to spread fear.
'Horrible' 'terrible' 'sickening' but I'll leave that up to your imagination?
I dont' have time for this Xhit."
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/988928403515551745
"Apparently, some people think I've always been a Trump supporter. Far from it!"
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1010348768896708608
"1) I voted for Evan McMullin. TRUE. To my everlasting shame. 2) I wrote for Reagan Battlion. FALSE. I submitted a bio to the site, that's all. 3) I mocked Trump & his supporters for a year. FALSE. I mocked them OVER a year, from early 2015 all the way to Nov. 2016."
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1038981019427319809
"I don't mean to sound arrogant here, but it needs to be said. I'm operating on a higher mental level than about 95% of the people on Twitter."
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1038981019427319809
http://drawandstrike.blogspot.com/2016/
http://drawandstrike.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-nikki-haley-rule-ever-since-south.html
"David Evan McMullin[1] (born April 2, 1976) is a former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) operations officer who ran as an independent during the 2016 United States presidential election.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_McMullin
------------------------------------------------------------
I often wonder if folks had discovered and had been following Life of Brian prior to election day 2016 would they ever be caught on a "Q" thread?
Many paths I guess.
Hope they think for themselves.
It's their choice.
And mine.
"Warning - The links on this page are valuable sources of information but there is no guarantee that all of the information provided is the truth. The truth is elusive at best and if you wish to find it you must listen to everyone, read everything, believe nothing unless you can prove it in your own research."
"This is the age of deception. We are engaged in an information war. Links will take you to many other websites containing varying degrees of personal belief, religious dogma, truth, lies, misinformation, and disinformation. We urge you to practice due diligence in your quest for truth." (Warnings credited to William Cooper)
MAGA!