Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Note that this isn't a proposal for a "voter card". Instead, the picture of the voter would be in the precinct book.
1 posted on 05/07/2019 9:20:22 AM PDT by asinclair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: asinclair

I live in PA. Our left-wing State Supreme Court has declared that voter ID’s violate the State Constitution.

What national proposal is going to address THAT?


2 posted on 05/07/2019 9:23:08 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

would the quality of the black & white photos put together by the county board of elections vary by states and county?


3 posted on 05/07/2019 9:23:41 AM PDT by SMGFan ("God love ya! What am I talking about")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

I recall an ex girlfriend who had a voter id. It was issued by her state and had her thumb print on it. It presumably also had a picture on it - I don’t recall. She claimed it was strictly to be used for voting and nothing else. Her state was Sonora.


4 posted on 05/07/2019 9:26:42 AM PDT by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

Well I feel the same about Taxes. The main argument against imposing Taxes is requirement about the cost and difficulty getting the Money to pay.


6 posted on 05/07/2019 9:31:16 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

Excellent ideas you have there.

But Joe Biden said voter suppression is racist...

So your logical and sensible ideas will be thrown out by a liberal judge somewhere.


7 posted on 05/07/2019 9:34:26 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair
The up front costs would be substantial for new equipment and training, with maintenance an extra and recurring administrative charge. This would fall on already strained local elections budgets. Most elections offices would oppose it as costly and unnecessary, while it would not address absentee ballot and vote by mail fraud.

Yet none of these points are fatal and the logic of the proposal is a strong point in its favor.

8 posted on 05/07/2019 9:38:27 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

Democrats will scream “voter suppression” on any attempt to combat vote fraud.

We could give poll watchers the right to take pictures of voters, to see if the same people show up at different polls, but they would scream “voter intimidation!” on that too.


9 posted on 05/07/2019 9:49:26 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

What do you do about the 40% of people who vote early via mail-in ballot?


10 posted on 05/07/2019 10:00:21 AM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair


12 posted on 05/07/2019 5:13:46 PM PDT by Chode ( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson