To: vannrox
Just an aside comment, but the second picture, which purportedly is an IIR with number and title, is totally fake. Besides the fact they would never put all that information about the report on a photograph, the fact that whoever did it misspelled “Cannon” really shoots that down.
That IIR would have been vetted quite a few times before it was published.
9 posted on
05/07/2019 5:53:02 AM PDT by
wbarmy
(I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
To: wbarmy
the fact that whoever did it misspelled “Cannon” really shoots that down.
Should have looked a little longer, that was the camera taking the picture, a Canon AE-1.
Obviously I need more coffee and better glasses.
10 posted on
05/07/2019 6:00:49 AM PDT by
wbarmy
(I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
To: wbarmy
Re: “Cannon”
Actually, it says, “35 mm Canon AE-1,” which was a camera from the Canon company in the ‘70s and ‘80s. So it is correctly spelled.
Not disputing the rest of your comment.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson