Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

This is dispiriting

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/04/28/listen-carefully-senator-lindsey-graham-outlines-deep-state-exit/

Listen Carefully – Senator Lindsey Graham Outlines Deep State Exit…

Those who participated in the 2015/2016 surveillance and spy operations, which evolved into the 2017 (through today) soft-coup effort, are relying on a defense that Russia ‘hacked’ the 2016 election. This false narrative is how the corrupt administrative state will defend themselves.

Pay close attention to this interview and note how Senator Graham supports that narrative saying: “the Russians hacked into John Podesta’s e-mails, the campaign manager for the Democratic candidate for President. The Russians hacked into Hillary Clinton’s e-mails, the candidate for the Democratic Party.”

This ‘Russia-hacking narrative’ is the DC ‘chaff and countermeasures‘; when combined with their ‘by-the-book‘ justifications, it becomes their unified defense. Once you accept their baseline, it becomes much more difficult to expose their unlawful conduct.

Transcript
...


1,274 posted on 04/28/2019 2:35:48 PM PDT by mairdie (Henry Livingston poetry - Hogs - https://youtu.be/Qfw1F1XcH0M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mairdie

I suspect that we’ll find that this is why Assange was grabbed up when he was.

#3312
“We have the source”.

Arrest or extraction?


1,277 posted on 04/28/2019 2:42:30 PM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1274 | View Replies ]

To: mairdie

This ‘Russia-hacking narrative’ is the DC ‘chaff and countermeasures‘; when combined with their ‘by-the-book‘ justifications, it becomes their unified defense. Once you accept their baseline, it becomes much more difficult to expose their unlawful conduct.

~~~~

I think that I’ve seen that elsewhere and I’ve been thinking it’s strategy. If Graham doesn’t have PROOF that it wasn’t the Russians, then he can’t say it; contrary assertions without public evidence would be assailed as partisanship.

Graham demonstrates “good will” (believes across the aisle info) by at first indicating he believes what he’s heard and at present the Mueller report says Russians were “involved” in the 2016 (influencing) the elections. But then Graham will obtain proof that it wasn’t Russians and they didn’t help Trump win, and he can then PUBLICLY sputter in disbelief, “ALL THIS TIME I’VE BEEN TOLD IT WAS RUSSIANS!” etc.

In other words, I’ve seen the Trump administration “not know” in the public sphere information that is only available in the Q sphere...until it’s “proven” otherwise in the public sphere. :)


1,280 posted on 04/28/2019 2:50:32 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson