Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fuzzylogic

Absolutely agree. They are behaving as a publisher, ( choosing who and what to publish) but want to be treated as a utility ( no responsibility for what digital content goes over their platform). They cant have it both ways. They have a complete monopoly on content on those few social media platforms right now.

Those people saying conservatives just need to start an alternative to FB and let the free market solve it, I say ok, are you doing that? I seriously doubt it. Good luck with that!


36 posted on 04/23/2019 2:46:47 PM PDT by boxlunch (Pray for President Trump! Disband the Democrat Media Communist Complex!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: boxlunch

They’re monopolies. Even if you create an alternative, which there are, you need to achieve a critical mass of users before people will consider switching. It’s similar to creating a new Operating System, you won’t get users unless there’s applications and the app developers won’t write apps for it unless there’s users.

At this point FB has no viable peer.


37 posted on 04/23/2019 5:16:14 PM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson