To: Heartlander
Sorry but Darwin’s insight is still the very best explanation to explain the diversity and complexity of multiple species other than a belief in mystical creation. Many religions have come to terms that Darwinian evolution is consistent with the existence of a divine plan since the details and scope of that plan are unknown. What is inconsistent with Darwinian theory is a literal interpretation of scripture and reading scripture as a scientific treatise. Human brains are probably the only species that has a high capacity for mysticism which is at the core of wonderment. It is why humans ask “why” and “how”. As long as those questions continue to be freely made, and people are allowed to reach their own conclusions however right or wrong without retribution, civilization and progress will continue.
4 posted on
04/16/2019 6:10:15 AM PDT by
allendale
(.)
To: allendale
Sorry but Darwin’s insight is still the very best explanation to explain the diversity and complexity of multiple species other than a belief in mystical creation. No. Darwin's theory does not remotely come close to explaining what is claimed.
It cannot explain how life originated.
5 posted on
04/16/2019 6:17:18 AM PDT by
ealgeone
To: allendale
Sorry but Darwin’s insight is still the very best explanation to explain the diversity and complexity of multiple species other than a belief in mystical creation. Many religions have come to terms that Darwinian evolution is consistent with the existence of a divine plan since the details and scope of that plan are unknown.
Sorry, but No.
It takes much, MUCH more faith to believe in the religion of Darwinism than to believe in the concept of Intelligent Design.
Darwinism flouts the Probability Math and the actual fossil record comes no where close to supporting that religion.
13 posted on
04/16/2019 6:35:40 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: allendale
Darwinism does not explain the origins of life.
18 posted on
04/16/2019 6:48:15 AM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: allendale
On the micro evolution front yes, but as a way to explain life moving from primordial slime to high level sentient life forms not so much.
24 posted on
04/16/2019 7:28:02 AM PDT by
redangus
To: allendale
“Sorry but Darwin’s insight is still the very best explanation to explain the diversity and complexity of multiple species other than a belief in mystical creation. “
What other non-”mystical creation” explanations are there?
38 posted on
04/16/2019 8:50:06 AM PDT by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson