[Leaning Right]

> The Rats haven’t yet really worked out the hierarchies of their Interesectional Politics. <

As a public service, I made up such a list about a year ago.

Muslims
Gays
Racial Minorities (except Asians, they’re treated like whites)
Feminists
Straight white females
Straight white males

As you can see, nothing outranks a Muslim. So if a Muslim beats up a Gay, the crime is excused due to “cultural differences”.

My list is still a work in progress. For example, would a minority lesbian feminist ( a three-fer) outrank a straight white male Muslim convert? I dunno. Maybe a point system is needed.

[Drew68]

For example, would a minority lesbian feminist ( a three-fer) outrank a straight white male Muslim convert?

I often wonder what liberals would do if white guys, fed up with being belittled and devalued in an emasculated, feminized culture, started converting to Islam?

Eventually Muslims are going to offer white Western men a good deal. "Come join Team Mo! We rule our roost and don't take any sh*t from anyone! And nobody stops us! And here's a little secret; we're not going to make you give up booze or bacon. The Chechens sure didn't!"

[wastoute]

You are forgetting the “l’m not white, i’m Jewish” demographic.

[\/\/ayne]

You know; that sounds like a great funny video; a bunch of liberal bystanders deciding what is the best politically correct reaction as various things happen.

[A_perfect_lady]

You're going to have to put Illegals separate from regular Hispanics on that list, and they may be right up there with Muslims, given that an Illegal man (22) murdered a Muslim girl (17) after a road rage incident in Virginia two years ago, and the media has been very awkward about it. They have such tender feelings toward them both, the NYT and WaPo's approach had a very muted, oddly respectful, unfortunate incident tone, and gave such a neutral report of "Darwin kills Nabra" it actually reminded me of decades ago when reporters tried to be objective.