Posted on 04/12/2019 11:16:53 AM PDT by MosesKnows
What is your opinion of the Democrat plan for asylum immigration? Perhaps I should say, what is your opinion of Democrats?
What is the Democrat plan to handle the emergency at America’s Southern border caused by asylum seekers? The best way I can explain is by example.
There are 100 immigrates seeking asylum. Two of the 100 seeking asylum wish to harm others. Our current asylum law will check out all 100 in order to separate the two who come to harm from the 98 who come for the opportunity to excel.
The Democrat plan for the same scenario is to release all 100 and avoid the cost in court time and money required to cull out the two bad ones. Later, we will have proof positive that the two bad ones are the ones apprehended harming someone.
The Democrats’ plan is to replace us with easily manipulated, low-IQ third worlders.
Which means yes, they actually do want these people to harm Americans. They are our replacements, so whatever accelerates the process of our extermination is what the Democrats want to do.
They just want another way to control the population and get their hands on YOUR money
I don’t they even want the $$ that much, as they want the POWER to control you!!!
Bush League Republicans MUST be replaced.
Bush League Republicans want to help the Democrats get a permanent majority through amnesty.
For 2020, the ones up are, Flimsey Grahamnesty, Thom Tillis, Gardner, McSally, Daines, Collins, Cornyn, Capito, Enzi, Rounds, Sasse, Hyde-Smith, McConnell.
They all should have primary challengers.
Bring em all in to RED STATES.
Keep em in a “family compound” under family unification.
ZERO contact with outside of any kind.
Bill Mexico for the food, housing, meds, police etc . . .
Boost up the “population” for the census and grab a few more House seats.
Then fly to Meh-he-co and bill em for the transport.
Sanctuary areas could be designated on publicly owned land in their home countries.
No one would be allowed in who is has been designated a gang member or other threat.
There might be a $11 application fee to get in, with a $1 discount if a dangerous person is named is named on a another form with relevant facts described and these facts are sworn to under pena de ley.
The national governments of Central America would soon be able to sort the good folks from the bad.
A request for asylum should have to include identifying information of all persons deemed to be a threat to the applicant and detailed statements to why such persons are a threat, sworn to under penalty of law.
The information should be computerized and provided to US asylum officers and also law enforcement in their home countries.
Pedro, there are 34 applicants that say you are a thug, three that say you are a rapist, etc.
The monetary systems of their home countries need to made fully electronic, such as Sweden is trying to do.
The mere possession of currency should then be made a 20-year criminal offense.
Gangs can’t operate in a country if every peso and dollar in the national economy is tracked.
“There are 100 immigrates seeking asylum. Two of the 100 seeking asylum wish to harm others. Our current asylum law will check out all 100 in order to separate the two who come to harm from the 98 who come for the opportunity to excel.”
And from what I remember only 10% of those that are left will actually be granted amnesty
That ol’ Mark of the Beast will sure cut down on the crime rate, eh?
“Do you think the cost savings from the Democrat plan is worth it?”
98 welfare recipients + 2 criminals
or
98 welfare recipients
I don’t see any cost savings.
Trump should simply issue executive orders calling for 100% blanket denials of asylum for each Central American country of origin.
Let these executive orders be adjudicated at the Supreme Court level.
The Supreme Court then needs to find that there is no justification to grant asylum with respect to any Central American country.
End this asylum nonsense.
“Boost up the ‘population’ for the census and grab a few more House seats.”
Nope!
“Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside...
“Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.”
Amendment XIV
There’s a reason why the 2020 census needs to have a citizenship question.
“number of persons in each State’
doesn’t read “Citizens”.
I wish it did, and we should Amend to fix it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.